By Gian Reyes | 08/07/2025
In today’s globalized workplace, the demand for skilled remote professionals has led companies to adopt diverse worker engagement models. While these flexible arrangements offer speed and scalability, they also come with significant risks if not structured correctly—particularly around the classification of workers as employees vs. independent contractors.
A landmark case in Australia has brought these risks into sharp focus. In Doessel Group Pty Ltd v Joanna Pascua [2025] FWC 1833, the Fair Work Commission ruled that a Philippine-based paralegal—engaged under an "independent contractor" agreement—was, in fact, an employee of the Queensland-based Doessel Group. Despite working remotely, Ms. Pascua’s fixed hours, use of company systems, and close supervision showed she was not operating her own business but integrated into the firm’s operations.
This case offers critical lessons for businesses engaging offshore workers—and highlights the value of Employer of Record (EOR) solutions, such as those offered by KMC Teams, to mitigate legal, financial, and reputational risk.
Misclassifying offshore workers as independent contractors—while exercising control typical of an employer—can expose companies to serious consequences:
These risks multiply when managing teams across borders, where compliance expectations vary by jurisdiction and are harder to navigate without in-country expertise.
The Pascua ruling shines a light on common mistakes businesses make when hiring offshore talent without clear legal frameworks:
Ms. Pascua received daily task assignments and performance supervision—clear indicators of an employment relationship.
She used company-branded tools, email signatures, and systems like a PBX phone line, making her appear as part of the internal team.
Her capped hourly rate and fixed schedule aligned more with employment than contractor flexibility—and her pay was below Australia’s minimum wage standard.
While her agreement labeled her an “Independent Contractor,” it contained KPIs, exclusivity, and required personal performance—all inconsistent with contractor status.
Doessel lacked expertise in cross-border labor law, leaving them vulnerable to international legal action.
KMC Teams offers a full-service Employer of Record (EOR) solution that eliminates the gray areas exposed in cases like Pascua vs. Doessel. Our model helps businesses scale confidently, without misclassification risk.
KMC Teams becomes the legal employer of your offshore staff—handling all regulatory, tax, and employment obligations—while you retain day-to-day oversight of operations.
We ensure:
This eliminates compliance risk across jurisdictions, including minimum wage enforcement.
By removing the direct employer relationship, KMC absorbs employment liabilities:
Our on-the-ground teams understand local employment culture and regulations. We:
Rather than underpaying or overpaying contractors, our model:
KMC Teams offers more than compliance—we provide end-to-end offshore operations support:
The Pascua case is a wake-up call for companies engaging overseas talent. Worker classification is no longer a paperwork issue—it’s a compliance risk with real financial and legal consequences.
With KMC Teams, you get:
We make offshore hiring secure, compliant, and people-first—so you can focus on growing your business without risk.
Don’t let worker misclassification disrupt your global strategy.
Partner with KMC Teams to build your offshore operations the right way.